Alternatives to Prison
This evidence is conclusive, Prison is expensive, it damages both those imprisoned and their families, it makes those locked up more likely to commit further offences and it does nothing directly to assist victims. Whilst alternatives will not be perfect they will have to be seriously flawed to be as bad as prison! (See Why Cage: The justifications for imprisonment)
In terms of alternatives these are listed in two groups, the first are currently available and used by courts. These are in my opinion weakened by the need to package them as punishment. The focus on punishment means that pragmatic solutions are often rejected despite evidence they will lead to reduced offending because they could be perceived as "soft". Courts have tended to use these against people they were not intending to imprison and they have therefore not been real alternatives to prison.
The second group are "radical" alternatives that are currently not used but which we would advocate.
The second group are "radical" alternatives that are currently not used but which we would advocate.
THE CURRENT ALTERNATIVES
Currently alternatives to prison include, cautions, discharges, compensation orders, fines, registration, "community" punishments and "control" or "tagging" orders
For full details of these click here
Currently alternatives to prison include, cautions, discharges, compensation orders, fines, registration, "community" punishments and "control" or "tagging" orders
For full details of these click here
THE RADICAL ALTERNATIVES
Radical alternatives are different because they are based not only on a different response to ?crime? but a very different understanding of crime, the criminal justice system and the nature of the society we live in. Those of us advocating alternatives to prison not only object to the immorality of caging tens of thousands of our fellow citizens but to a criminal justice system that is institutionally racist, denies many citizens basic civil rights and is targeted at the poor and powerless. We don?t want to control the poor, abuse children or oppress black citizens.
Prison is fundamentally about punishment, the infliction of pain. Its use on such a wide ranging scale depends on a criminal justice system that focuses on the need to exert social control and punish individuals without understanding the social context for their behaviour or without any real concern for their victims. There is no doubt that some peoples selfish, anti social or inappropriate behaviour causes real damage. Advocating radical alternatives is not about ignoring or excusing such behaviour. It is about focusing responses on effective, just and proportionate responses. It is about trying to create real justice, that recognises a wrong has been done (where this can be proved!) and that society is best served by providing appropriate restitution to the victim and solutions that address the real problems and thus reduce future crime.
In responding to the phenemem of crime we need to stop lashing out, demanding the infliction of pain and start critically evaluating the exact problem we are facing and what is the most effective and just solution.
Radical alternatives are different because they are based not only on a different response to ?crime? but a very different understanding of crime, the criminal justice system and the nature of the society we live in. Those of us advocating alternatives to prison not only object to the immorality of caging tens of thousands of our fellow citizens but to a criminal justice system that is institutionally racist, denies many citizens basic civil rights and is targeted at the poor and powerless. We don?t want to control the poor, abuse children or oppress black citizens.
Prison is fundamentally about punishment, the infliction of pain. Its use on such a wide ranging scale depends on a criminal justice system that focuses on the need to exert social control and punish individuals without understanding the social context for their behaviour or without any real concern for their victims. There is no doubt that some peoples selfish, anti social or inappropriate behaviour causes real damage. Advocating radical alternatives is not about ignoring or excusing such behaviour. It is about focusing responses on effective, just and proportionate responses. It is about trying to create real justice, that recognises a wrong has been done (where this can be proved!) and that society is best served by providing appropriate restitution to the victim and solutions that address the real problems and thus reduce future crime.
In responding to the phenemem of crime we need to stop lashing out, demanding the infliction of pain and start critically evaluating the exact problem we are facing and what is the most effective and just solution.
Reducing the number of crimes
Our first response must be to question what is a "crime". We need to focus on those acts that really do cause harm. We also need to understand that some things are best dealt with outside the criminal justice system. The current New Labour government has created over 1,000 new crimes, acts that previously would not have been criminal which now are. We would seek to reverse this trend. Unruly or difficult children needs support, education, and other welfare responses. The answer to children hanging around on street corners must lie in improved youth services not in imprisoning our children. Likewise the very real problems generated by drug use, prostitution, or mental illness cannot be solved by caging or otherwise punishing those who in reality need support and welfare services. Who really cares more about a woman involved in prostitution, the person who locks her up, fines her (forcing her back onto the streets to pay it), removes her children or the person who seeks to get her treatment for her addiction, safety from her pimp, and alternative employment that her allows her a decent income for herself and her children? Other current offences that have no victims or do no significant harm like casual recreational drug use should be entirely legal
Our first response must be to question what is a "crime". We need to focus on those acts that really do cause harm. We also need to understand that some things are best dealt with outside the criminal justice system. The current New Labour government has created over 1,000 new crimes, acts that previously would not have been criminal which now are. We would seek to reverse this trend. Unruly or difficult children needs support, education, and other welfare responses. The answer to children hanging around on street corners must lie in improved youth services not in imprisoning our children. Likewise the very real problems generated by drug use, prostitution, or mental illness cannot be solved by caging or otherwise punishing those who in reality need support and welfare services. Who really cares more about a woman involved in prostitution, the person who locks her up, fines her (forcing her back onto the streets to pay it), removes her children or the person who seeks to get her treatment for her addiction, safety from her pimp, and alternative employment that her allows her a decent income for herself and her children? Other current offences that have no victims or do no significant harm like casual recreational drug use should be entirely legal
Non-penal residential provision
Magistrates and judges often claim they send people to prison because there is nowhere else for them to go. This may be because they are homeless or because their home is not an appropriate place for them to be.
The lack of homes or residential provision should be no excuse. Prison is about imflicting pain and is now place for a child or a vulnerable adult. Good quality residential provision needs to be developed, prioritising schemes for children but also responding to the needs of homeless, mentally ill, and addicted convicts.
Magistrates and judges often claim they send people to prison because there is nowhere else for them to go. This may be because they are homeless or because their home is not an appropriate place for them to be.
The lack of homes or residential provision should be no excuse. Prison is about imflicting pain and is now place for a child or a vulnerable adult. Good quality residential provision needs to be developed, prioritising schemes for children but also responding to the needs of homeless, mentally ill, and addicted convicts.
To be continued..........